關於羅夏克墨跡測驗...
Shin心理小秘書參照 Exner 解釋系統進行計分及解釋
呵呵
Sequence of Scores (請依序輸入受測者逐個反應的編碼)
| Card | Resp.No. | Location | DQ | Loc.No. | Determinants | FQ | (2) | contents | P | Z-Score | Special Score | |
| 新增反應 | ||||||||||||
| Card | 第幾個 | Location | DQ | 位置編號 | 決定因子 | FQ | (2) | 內容 | P | Z-Score | Special Score | |
各項指標及參考解釋
Structural Summary
| Location Features | |||||||||||||
| Organization Activity | Location | Development Quality | |||||||||||
| Zf | ZSum | ZEst | W | D | W+D | Dd | S | + | o | v/+ | v | ||
| Form Quality | |||||
| + | o | u | - | none | |
| FQx | |||||
| MQual | |||||
| W+D | |||||
| Determinants - Single & Blends | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| M | FM | m | FC | CF | C | Cn | FC' | C'F | C' | FT | TF | T | FV | VF | V | FY | YF | Y | Fr | rF | FD | F | (2) | |
| Determinants - Blends |
| Contents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| H | (H) | Hd | (Hd) | Hx | A | (A) | Ad | (Ad) | An | Art | Ay | Bl | Cg | Ex | Fi | Fd | Ge | Hh | Cl | Sc | Sx | Xy | Id | Bt | Ls | Na |
| Special Score | |||||||||||||||||||
| DV1 | DV2 | INC1 | INC2 | DR1 | DR2 | FAB1 | FAB2 | ALOG | CON | AB | AG | COP | CP | GHR | PHR | MOR | PER | PSV | |
| Raw Sum6 | |
| Wgtd Sum6 |
| Core Section | |||||||
| R | L | ||||||
| EB | EA | EBPer | |||||
| eb | es | D | |||||
| Adj es | Adj D | ||||||
| FM | SumC' | SumT | |||||
| m | SumV | SumY | |||||
| Special Indices | ||||||||||
| PTI | DEPI | CDI | S-CON | HVI | OBS | |||||
STRUCTURAL SUMMARY
| Location Features | Determinants | Contents | Approach | |||||||||||||||||||
| Blends | Single + Blends | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Zf | = | M | = | H | = | I | ||||||||||||||||
| ZSum | = | FM | = | (H) | = | II | ||||||||||||||||
| ZEst | = | m | = | Hd | = | III | ||||||||||||||||
| FC | = | (Hd) | = | IV | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | = | CF | = | Hx | = | V | ||||||||||||||||
| D | = | C | = | A | = | VI | ||||||||||||||||
| W+D | = | Cn | = | (A) | = | VII | ||||||||||||||||
| Dd | = | FC' | = | Ad | = | VIII | ||||||||||||||||
| S | = | C'F | = | (Ad) | = | IX | ||||||||||||||||
| C' | = | An | = | X | ||||||||||||||||||
| FT | = | Art | = | |||||||||||||||||||
| Develop. Qual. | TF | = | Ay | = | Special Score | |||||||||||||||||
| + | = | T | = | Bl | = | Lv1 | Lv2 | |||||||||||||||
| o | = | FV | = | Cg | = | DV | = | x1 | x2 | |||||||||||||
| v/+ | = | VF | = | Ex | = | INC | = | x2 | x4 | |||||||||||||
| v | = | V | = | Fi | = | DR | = | x3 | x6 | |||||||||||||
| FY | = | Fd | = | FAB | = | x4 | x7 | |||||||||||||||
| YF | = | Ge | = | ALOG | = | x5 | ||||||||||||||||
| Form Quality | Y | = | Hh | = | CON | = | x7 | |||||||||||||||
| FQx | MQual | W+D | Fr | = | Cl | = | Raw Sum6 | = | ||||||||||||||
| + | = | = | = | rF | = | Sc | = | Wgtd Sum6 | = | |||||||||||||
| o | = | = | = | FD | = | Sx | = | |||||||||||||||
| u | = | = | = | F | = | Xy | = | AB | = | AG | = | |||||||||||
| - | = | = | = | Id | = | COP | = | CP | = | |||||||||||||
| none | = | = | = | Bt | = | GHR | = | PHR | = | |||||||||||||
| (2) | = | Ls | = | MOR | = | PER | = | |||||||||||||||
| Na | = | PSV | = | |||||||||||||||||||
RATIOS, PERCENTAGES, AND DERIVATIONS
| R | = | L | = | FC:CF+C | = | COP | = | |||||||||||
| Pure C | = | AG | = | |||||||||||||||
| EB | = | EA | = | EBPer | = | SumC':WSumC | = | GHR:PHR | = | |||||||||
| eb | = | es | = | D | = | Afr | = | a:p | = | |||||||||
| Adj es | = | Adj D | = | S | = | Food | = | |||||||||||
| Blends:R | = | SumT | = | |||||||||||||||
| FM | = | SumC' | = | SumT | = | CP | = | Human Cont | = | |||||||||
| m | = | SumV | = | SumY | = | Pure H | = | |||||||||||
| PER | = | |||||||||||||||||
| Iso Indx | = | |||||||||||||||||
| a:p | = | Sum6 | = | XA% | = | Zf | = | 3r+(2)/R | = | |||||||||
| Ma:Mp | = | Lv2 | = | WDA% | = | W:D:Dd | = | Fr+rF | = | |||||||||
| 2AB+Art+Ay | = | WSum6 | = | X-% | = | W:M | = | SumV | = | |||||||||
| MOR | = | M- | = | S- | = | Zd | = | FD | = | |||||||||
| Mnone | = | P | = | PSV | = | An+Xy | = | |||||||||||
| X+% | = | DQ+ | = | MOR | = | |||||||||||||
| Xu% | = | DQv | = | H:(H)+Hd+(Hd) | = | |||||||||||||
| PTI | = | DEPI | = | CDI | = | S-CON | = | HVI | = | OBS | = | |||||||||||||
Shin心理師 你的臨床小秘書
Sequence of Scores
| Card | Resp. No. | Location & DQ | Loc. No. | Determinant(s) & FQ | (2) | Content(s) | Pop | Z-Score | Special Scores |
Interpretaion
| 建議解釋順序: |
| Controls and Stress Tolerance | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: AdjD and CDI (對於控制及壓力忍受的初步訊息) | ||
| Step 2: EA (EA 為可得資源的指標, 透過 EA 評判 AdjD 的可信度) | ||
| EA 的平均範圍: 7-11 | ||
| Step 3: EB & L (評判 EA & AdjD 可信度) | ||
| Step 4: Adj es (評判 EA & AdjD 可信度) | ||
| Adj es 的平均範圍: 5-9 | ||
| Step 5: eb (審視 Adj es 中與壓力無關的因素，因其可能造成 AdjD 有誤) | ||
| Situationally Related Stress | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: D, EA, es, Adj es, history (從 EA - es & EA - Adj es 間的差異甄別 D 分數是否偽陽性) | ||
| Step 2: AdjD - D (作為壓力量的初步估計) | ||
| Step 3: m & SumY (關注情境壓力對個體的思考或感受的影響) | ||
| Step 4: Adj D, D, SumT, SumV (考慮 T & V 反應是否與情境壓力有關) | ||
| Step 5: D (關注刺激過載及衝動的可能性) | ||
| Step 6: Blends with m or Y (關注因情境壓力造成刺激需求增加而衍生的心理複雜度攀升) | ||
| Step 7: Color-Shading Blends (情境壓力可能造成與感受有關的混淆或矛盾) | ||
| Processing Section | ||||||||||||
| Zf | W:D:Dd | W:M | Zd | PSV | DQ+ | DQv | ||||||
| Information Processing | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: Zf (投注於訊息處理的心力) | ||
| Step 2: W:D:Dd (心力的投入與策略的使用) | ||
| W:D 的預期比例為 1:1.3 - 1:1.6 | ||
| Step 3: Location Sequencing (確認 Step1, Step2 中的發現 & 心力投入及處理策略的規律性) | ||
| 於 Card I, IV, V 給出 W 反應是比較不耗費心力的 當大部分 W 反應出現於此三卡，則顯示個體較節省心力，否則投入更多心力 | ||
| Card | 反應位置 | |
| Card I | ||
| Card II | ||
| Card III | ||
| Card IV | ||
| Card V | ||
| Card VI | ||
| Card VII | ||
| Card VIII | ||
| Card IX | ||
| Card X | ||
| Step 4: W:M (成就導向 反應個體心力投注與可得資源間的一致性) | ||
| W:M 的預期比例為: extra: 1.2:1-3:1; intro: 0.75:1-1.5:1; ambit: 1.2:1-2:1 | ||
| Step 5: Zd (訊息處理時掃視刺激的效率) | ||
| Step 6: PSV (訊息處理效率的問題) | ||
| within Card PSV: 與先前反應幾乎一致的反應，有相同位置、DQ、決定因子、FQ、內容編碼、Z (需自行判斷受測者的 PSV 有幾個屬於 within Card PSV，並依此選擇 Finding1 or Finding2 or no Finding) | ||
| Step 7: DQ (訊息處理的品質) | ||
| DQ+ 的預期範圍為: extra: 5-8; intro: 7-10; ambit: 5-8 | ||
| Step 8: DQ Sequencing (藉由 DQ 的分佈評估訊息處理的適切性與品質) | ||
| Card | 發展品質 | |
| Card I | ||
| Card II | ||
| Card III | ||
| Card IV | ||
| Card V | ||
| Card VI | ||
| Card VII | ||
| Card VIII | ||
| Card IX | ||
| Card X | ||
| Mediation Section | ||||||||||||
| XA% | WDA% | X-% | S- | P | X+% | Xu% | ||||||
| Cognitive Mediation | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: XA% & WDA% (形狀使用的適切性，即情境下行為反應的適切性) | ||
| XA% = sum(FQ+, FQo, FQu)/R WDA% = sum(FQ+, FQo, FQu on W or D)/(W+D) | ||
| Step 2: FQnone (忽略邊界對刺激轉譯的影響) | ||
| Step 3: X-%, FQ- freq., S- freq. (minus 反應是轉譯時扭曲或無視現實刺激，可能受出個人內在層面的投射影像) | ||
| Step 3a: Homogeneity (FQ- 的同質性分析) | ||
| Step 3b: Minus Disotortion Leves (逐一審視 FQ- 偏離現實的程度) | ||
| Step 4: Populars (情境中，當預期或被社會廣納的行為的線索很容易被辨認時，個體做出明顯常規反應的傾向) (P.S. 該做啥時就做啥) | ||
| Popular 的預期範圍為: (if R < 17) 4 - 6; (if R 介於 17 - 28) 5 - 7; (if R > 28) 6 - 9 | ||
| Step 5: FQ+ freq. (過度闡述，智力功能佳或受良好教育者傾向給出 1 - 3 個 FQ+) | ||
| Step 6: X+% & Xu% (比較適切 FQ 反應中，是較傾向遵循常規，或是較傾向個人反應) | ||
| Ideation Section | ||||||||||||||||
| a:p | Ma:Mp | 2AB+Art+Ay | MOR | Sum6 | Lvl-2 | WSum6 | M- | M none | ||||||||
| Ideation | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: EB & Lambda (因應風格於意念思考活動) | ||
| Step 2: EBPer (於決策時，因應風格影響的廣泛程度，即風格的彈性) | ||
| Step 3: a:p (態度與價值觀的彈性，及其對概念思考的影響) | ||
| a + p ≥ 4 才解釋此步驟 | ||
| Step 4: HVI, OBS, MOR (可能影響概念形成的心智結構或態度) | ||
| Step 5: Left-eb (sum of FM & m) (意識未關注到的周圍的心智活動，FM 與內在需求經驗有關，m 與外在環境要求有關，可能入侵並干擾概念思考) | ||
| FM 的預期範圍為: 3 - 5 m 的預期範圍為: 0 - 2 且低於 FM | ||
| Step 6: Ma:Mp (投入幻想思考以迴避現實的傾向) | ||
| (僅 M > 1 才解釋此步驟) | ||
| Step 7: Intellectualization Index (理智化 (概念思考) 地應對情緒，使感受被弱化或中性化的一種否認的防衛方式) | ||
| Step 8: Sum6 & WSum6 (思考清晰度及怪異度) | ||
| Mild (DV1, INC1, DR1): 認知上粗心的，顯示思考較不清晰。 DV1: 短暫認知管理不善，扭曲的語言使用或特殊的表達方式造成溝通不清楚; INC1: 概念上的區辨失敗或固化的推理，但不怪異; DR1: 猶豫不決或企圖防衛地抽離手邊作業，可能判斷力差，過多則顯示對意念的衝動控制不佳 Serious (DV2, FAB1, INC2, ALOG): DV2: 更嚴重的認知管理缺陷，有些成見侵入概念運思; INC2: 不僅區辨失敗，而且怪異，並反映非常牽強的邏輯，常見於思考受成見嚴重影響或明顯忽視現實者; FAB1: 不成熟的意念形式，概念連結鬆散，不合理的整合，思考很不清晰; ALOG: 錯誤的因果關係被牽強的推論，且被輕易的創造並維持，顯示判斷力不佳及不成熟的思考 Severe (DR2, FAB2, CONTAM): DR2: 更為嚴重的意念衝動控制問題，持續朝向目標的能力受損; FAB2: 概念化歷程嚴重扭曲崩壞且怪異，因無法控制意念活動而呈現全然忽視現實、嚴重判斷缺陷、或不堪重負; CONTAM: 最為嚴重的意念組織混亂，結合極為牽強推理的概念化歷程，呈現明顯脫離現實的思考形式 | ||
| Step 9: Quality of 6 Special Scores (主觀評估特殊分數) | ||
| 當 Step 8 有異常發現，需進一步判斷以下 3 項
(1) 反映文化現象、教育有限、持續的字詞選擇傾向的程度 (2) 回應中呈現思考不清晰或判斷錯誤的程度 (3) CONTAM、ALOG、Level 2 中的怪異特徵反映病態思考的程度 | ||
| Step 10: FQ of M (M 反應表徵概念思考，其形狀品質則可用以評估此思考的清晰度) | ||
| Step 11: Quality of M (更進一步評估思考的品質及清晰度) | ||
| Affect Section | ||||||||||||
| FC:CF+C | Pure C | SumC':WSumC | Afr | S | Blends:R | CP | ||||||
| Affect | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: DEPI & CDI (判斷情緒困擾及可能來源) | ||
| Step 2: EB & Lambda (EB 判斷因應風格, L 判別是否受更廣泛的迴避風格影響解釋) | ||
| introversive style: EA ≤ 10 時，EB 左 ≥ EB 右 + 2；EA > 10 時，EB 左 > EB 右 + 2 extratensive style: EA ≤ 10 時，EB 右 ≥ EB 左 + 2；EA > 10 時，EB 右 > EB 左 + 2 ambitent style: 不屬於以上任一種風格時 avoidant style: 若 L > 0.99, 則除上述三種風格外 應再加上迴避風格 (如: introversive-avoidant style) | ||
| Step 3: EBPer (因應風格的廣泛性或彈性，L < 1 且非不一致的因應風格時才解釋) | ||
| Step 4: R-eb & related (不尋常的痛苦經驗) | ||
| 一般情況下: SumT ≤ 1, SumC' ≤ 2, SumV = 0, SumY ≤ 2 | ||
| Step 5: SumC':WSumC (對於情緒表達過度壓抑) | ||
| Step 6: Affective Ratio (對情緒刺激的興趣及接近性) | ||
| Afr 的平均範圍: extra: 0.6 - 0.89; intro: 0.53 - 0.78; ambi: 0.53 - 0.83; avoid: 0.45 - 0.65 | ||
| Step 7: Intellectualization Index (理智化的運用: 以理智思考的方式減弱或中性化情緒刺激及經驗的影響，是一種用以否認或取消感受的虛假理智活動，使減少情緒被直接或切實地面對的機會) | ||
| Step 8: Color Projection (以不尋常的否認形式來應對不愉悅的情緒經驗) | ||
| Step 9: FC:CF+C (對情緒表達的調節; FC 情緒調節較穩定, CF & C 對情緒表達較無約束) | ||
| Step 10: Pure C (判斷 Pure C 是否表徵了不成熟/原始 或 為情緒調節議題) | ||
| Step 11: Space responses (消極、對抗、憤怒) | ||
| Step 12: Blends, Lambda & EB (心理複雜度) | ||
| Blends 佔總反應數的比例的平均範圍: intro: 13 - 26%; extra: 19 - 33%; ambit: 16 - 36%; avoid: 8 - 14% | ||
| Step 13: m & Y Blends (考慮與情境壓力相關的心理複雜度) | ||
| Step 14: Blend complexity (不尋常的心理複雜度) | ||
| Step 15: Color-shading blends (不確定、混淆、甚至矛盾的感受) | ||
| Step 16: Shading blends (非常痛苦的情緒經驗) | ||
| Self Perception Section | ||||||||||||
| 3r+(2)/R | Fr+rF | SumV | FD | An+Xy | MOR | H:(H)+Hd+(Hd) | ||||||
| Self-Perception | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: OBS & HVI (強迫及過度警覺特質與自我知覺的關聯) | ||
| Step 2: Reflections (自戀般的人格特質，高度重視自我的一種傾向) | ||
| Step 3: Egocentricity Index (自我關注 self-concern 及自尊 self-esteem) | ||
| Egocentricity Index 的預期範圍為: 0.33 - 0.45 | ||
| Step 4: FD & Vista (自我審視之內省行為，FD: 正向的內省傾向 (反省); V: 負相的內省傾向 (罪惡懊悔)) | ||
| Step 5: An + Xy (不尋常的身體關注) | ||
| Step 6: MOR (自我意象涵蓋了負面或有缺陷的特徵) | ||
| Step 7: Human Content (個體對自我的印象) | ||
| Step 7a: H:(Hd)+Hd+(Hd) (自我意象基於現實及完整的程度) | ||
| 當 Human Content ≥ 3 時才解釋 7a 此步驟 | ||
| Step 7b: Response with Human Content (回顧所有包含人類內容的反應，以進一步分析自我意象) | ||
| Step 8: search for projections (找出並解釋可能帶有投射的反應) | ||
| 可能出現投射的反應有: FQ-, MOR, M, Human Content, Fm & m 宜分群尋找是否有投射材料，進一步解釋其對自我知覺的影響，若無投射可跳過此步驟。 | ||
| Interpersonal Section | ||||||||||||||||||||
| COP | AG | GHR:PHR | a:p | Food | SumT | Human Cont | Pure H | PER | Isolation Index | |||||||||||
| Interpersonal Perception | ||
| Finding | 判准 | 解釋 |
| Step 1: CDI (社交的不成熟及能力不足指標) | ||
| Step 2: HVI (過度警覺特質對人際關係的影響) | ||
| Step 3: a:p (在關係中傾向採被動角色的程度) | ||
| Step 4: Fd (是否有依賴傾向，而這可能影響人際關係) | ||
| Step 5: SumT (親密需求及對親密情緒關係的開放度) | ||
| Step 6: Human Content & Pure H (人際興趣) | ||
| Human Content 的預期範圍為:
intro: 4 - 6; ambit: 2 - 4; extra: 2 - 4; avoid: 2 - 5 (for R ≤ 16) intro: 5 - 8; ambit: 4 - 7; extra: 3 - 6; avoid: 4 - 7 (for 17 ≤ R ≤ 27) intro: 7 - 11; ambit: 5 - 9; extra: 4 - 7; avoid: 5 - 9 (for R > 27) | ||
| Step 7: GHR:PHR (人際行為及其效果) | ||
| GHR: 通常表徵有效的且具適應性的人際行為。
PHR: 通常表徵較為無效且不具適應性的行為，可能有較多人際衝突或挫敗。 | ||
| Step 8: COP & AG (人際交流) | ||
| COP: 通常表徵個體預期正向的人際交流。
AG: 通常表徵個體預期具攻擊性或競爭性的人際交流。 | ||
| Step 9: PER (自我再保證、迴避來自施測者的挑戰) | ||
| Step 10: Isolation Index (人際疏離) | ||
| Step 11: contents of M & FM with pairs (澄清或擴張先前發現) | ||